Functional fertility takes a holistic approach to optimizing male and female fertility through addressing nutrition and lifestyle factors.
Olivia Neely specializes in functional fertility. Read on for a crash course about what functional fertility is, why our conventional medical system is not set up to provide this support, and how to tell if following this approach could be for you.
You can find the original version of this post here.
My personal definition of functional fertility goes something like this:
Functional fertility is a systems-based approach to optimize both female and male fertility by addressing nutritional, lifestyle, and psychological components that correct root-cause imbalances in order to prevent or drastically reduce infertility. Functional fertility has long-lasting benefits for the entire family unit beginning in the prenatal period and extending through to adulthood in the offspring impacting the health of generations to come.
If you are not familiar with the idea of practicing in a “functional” way, I encourage you to read my blog here. In brief, “functional” medicine is a medical approach that treats health problems or prevents them by addressing the body as an interconnected unit.
This is a very different model than the standard model of care, especially in the U.S., where our allopathic care model takes a “pill for an ill” approach that addresses one part of the body at a time. You go to the gynecologist to help with your period problems, the dermatologist for acne, and a therapist for anxiety, yet none of these experts talk to one another. If they did, they might see how they could work together to accomplish relief of all of these symptoms for you, but this doesn’t happen.
Here in the United States we have amazing emergency resources. If I am ever in an emergency situation (a car accident, a broken bone, GI bleed, etc.), I would be incredibly thankful to be under this type of medical care. However, this focus on emergency care and the “pill for an ill” model does not offer much in terms of preventive or wellness care, especially for women.
This leaves otherwise healthy individuals with a lack of answers to common underlying symptoms that are impacting their overall quality of life such as:
How many of you can relate to this picture?
This meme provides more than just a quick chuckle. It illustrates how our allopathic model of care is woefully lacking in the ability to see beyond the standard model of treatment and connect with the person in front of them:
The doctor has limited time to talk with you in a rushed (and usually late) visit.
The decision is made to run a standard lab panel, and then tell you that everything looks “normal” even though you are feeling terrible.
You exit the appointment still needing answers.
How disconcerting and frustrating!
The root of the problem here is that the allopathic model of care simply is not built to be able to provide the kind of care that many of us need.
Conventional “in network” doctors generally must see 20+ patients daily due to the way the US reimbursement system is structured, and this has led to a median visit length of 15.7 minutes per patient with an average 1-5 minutes spent on 6 topics (1).
While this certainly is not enough time to get to the underlying issues behind anyone’s health problems, I’d like to make it clear that this is not their fault. Our conventional GPs, OBGYNs, endocrinologists, and other MDs are all highly trained, brilliant individuals. But when they work within our conventional health system, it’s nearly impossible to practice a more comprehensive model of care.
This is exactly the kind of system failure I am seeing surrounding the ever growing rates of infertility. 1 in 8 US couples has trouble getting pregnant or sustaining a pregnancy. Globally, infertility affects an estimated 15% of couples (2).
After trying to conceive for several months, many couples are sent home from the doctor with the following advice:
“Nothing seems wrong. Your labs are normal! You are financially ready for a baby and in great shape. Go home, have sex for a year, then come back and we will look into fertility treatments then.”
Let’s take a closer look at this scenario:
These are just several areas that impact our fertility that a couple can be actively working to improve while they wait to hit the 12 month mark of TTC (trying to conceive), which is the point at which an infertility diagnosis can be made under the standard approach. Unfortunately, as mentioned above, most couples are advised to revisit their doctors upon hitting the year-mark without said doctors taking a closer look at lifestyle factors that could be inhibiting conception.
Once an official infertility diagnosis is made, most conventional doctors will revert straight to medical intervention, more often than not with a hyper focus on the women’s reproductive system (even though 1 in 3 infertility cases are caused my male reproductive issues (2), many of which can be improved with dietary and lifestyle practices!).
With so much female fertility technology available like Clomid, intrauterine insemination (IUI), and in vitro fertilization (IVF), it’s easy for many to jump right to these as solutions.
For many doctors in the standard (allopathic) model of care it doesn’t make sense to dive deep into areas like hormone balance, gut health, thyroid support, and stress management. Addressing root causes for infertility such as a short luteal phase, low progesterone, PCOS, hypothyroidism, autoimmune disease, poor sleep hygiene, and gut dysbiosis is often overshadowed by the ease that a quick Clomid prescription or IUI attempt can bring.
A single round of IVF generally costs upward of $10,000, sometimes sitting in the $15,000 range. Many employers are beginning to cover this as a benefit for their employees, but for women who do not have this coverage, IVF can be a hefty investment.
If you wanted a baby yesterday and have the health coverage or personal savings to pay for these procedures, taking the standard approach may work for you. But, if you aren’t ready to commit to invasive procedures and lofty medical bills, it’s important to know that you have other options.
None of the solutions above address the underlying root-causes of impaired fertility, which can be many and take a little bit of digging. For couples who want to address underlying root causes behind trouble conceiving – and are also comfortable that addressing these issues and seeing changes can take upwards of 6-12 months – a functional approach may be a better fit.
Much like general preventative care, we can make changes now to optimize our future fertility. We know that a full cycle of egg development takes 4 months, and several cycles are sometimes needed to prepare our bodies for conception if we have recently been on hormonal birth control or are trying to re-balance our body from a condition like PCOS.
This in mind, I generally recommend women start to prepare their bodies 6-12 months before they even start trying to conceive; it takes many of us at least a full egg cycle to optimize our fertility if we are starting from a place of imbalance. During this time, I have found it helpful to follow an approach of the “three pillars of functional fertility” –
In short, everyone! Let’s take a close look at this.
Citations
(1) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2254573/
(2) Manaker, L. (n.d.). Introduction. In Fueling Male Fertility (p. 2)
(3) Fett, R. (n.d.). The Egg Quality Diet. In It Starts With The Egg (p. 207)
(4) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15723162
(5) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544936
(6) Fett, R. (n.d.). The Egg Quality Diet. In It Starts With The Egg (p. 112)
(7) Fett, R. (n.d.). The Egg Quality Diet. In It Starts With The Egg (p. 22)